WELCOME

While everyone is entitled to their own opinions, everyone is not entitled to their own set of facts.








Wednesday, September 12, 2012

The Tale of the Tower – Part 2

 
                                                   Lucas van Valckenborch 1568


        
                 IMPORTANT SUMERIAN AND AKKADIAN SITES AND THE BIBLE
Genesis 10:10 refers to "Babel" (Babylon-NIV), "Erech," "Akkad," and "the land of Shinar." // Genesis 11:28-31 refer to "Ur." // Genesis 11:31, 32 and 12:4-5 refer to "Haran."This map also shows the location of the Amarah Crater. This two mile in diameter crater provides physical evidence that a cosmic impact took place in the Holy Land during Biblical times. The crater was discovered after Saddam Hussein had the lakes drained in Southern Iraq in retaliation against the Marsh Arabs in the area. The Sumerian text The Curse of Akkad and the Bible’s story of the destruction of the "Tower of Babel" both record the occurrence of this catastrophic event which ties to the sudden abandonment of Akkadian sites, and collapse of the Akkadian Empire.
 
The Tale of the Tower – Part 2
What Does the Tower of Babel Story Tell Us
About the End Times?
 
 
How can a nine verse story that appears in Genesis 11 about people who spoke one language while building a city and a tower cause concern for God and be connected to End Times?  Based on excerpts from Dr. Jeffrey Goodman’s book The Comets of God come an intriguing explanation. 
 
 
The traditional interpretation of the Bible’s story of the destruction of the Tower of Babel poses several problems.  The idea that at one time all the people of the whole earth spoke the same language and travelled to a plain in “the land of Shinar” to build a city and a tower does not fit with what we know from other scriptures in the Bible (Genesis 10:10 and Zechariah 5:11) that also talk about the “land of Shinar.”  A second problem is that the traditional interpretation of a universal language at the time of the Tower does not fit archeological and historical records.  While some people considered this Bible story to be a myth, the corrected translation provides an account that is consistent with the writings of the people from the two adjoining nations who spoke different languages in the land of Shinar.  It is these people who were building the new city and tower when God did something that stopped the people’s plans and caused them to scatter.
 Why was God so upset?  The defiant act that kindled divine wrath was not a universal language or the building of a city and tower, but rather the establishment of the ancient Near East’s first empire. Politically an empire has absolute authority over a group of states or nations consisting of people from different ethnic groups and languages who have been united and become one as a result of military domination.  Empires are ruled by a single chief of state called an emperor.  Since an empire represents a level of government higher than any of the nations it is ruling, an empire could let a brutal dictator begin to do anything he imagined to do in the world. Recall the abuses of the ancient Roman Empire during the Classical period.
The ancient Near East’s first powerful empire, known as the Akkadian Empire, was ruled by Sargon, an Akkadian who had carved out a multi-national empire that went from sea to sea, from the Persian Gulf to the Mediterranean.  Just as archeological findings of the historical Akkadian Empire’s city of Akkad have confirmed the Bible’s city of Akkad, it has also shown that the historical Akkadian ruler called Sargon was one in the same as the ruler the Bible refers to as Nimrod.  The Bible says it was Nimrod who founded a kingdom or empire in the land of Shinar, the land of Sumer and Akkad that included the ceremonial center at Babylon and the cities of Erech and Akkad (Genesis 10:8-10 and 11:1-4).   Likewise the historical records show that Sargon founded an empire in the land of Sumer and Akkad that included Babylon and the cities of Erech and Akkad.  
When the Bible (Genesis 10:9) says that Nimrod “was a mighty hunter,” the Bible is clearly identifying him as an Akkadian king, because all the kings of the Akkadian culture were celebrated as “mighty hunters.”  Based on cuneiform inscriptions, archeologists know that the ritual hunting of lions was a traditional past time, a “lordly sport” for Akkadian Kings.[1]  Writing about the person the Bible calls Nimrod, Dr. D. J. Wiseman of the University of London, a leading authority on Assyriology, notes that “many scholars compare him (Nimrod) with Sargon of Akkad c. 2300 BC, who was a great warrior and huntsman and ruler. . . .”  While Dr. Jeffrey Goodman, is not the first archeologist to connect Sargon and Nimrod as the same person, he may be the first to show the Bible’s story of the Tower is about the destruction of the Akkadian Empire, where God in accord with His pattern, used comets as the weapons of His wrath.
The corrected translation of this Bible story tells how the God of the Bible, because of a defiant act on the part of mankind, brought about the destruction of the new empire and scattered the people who were building the new city and the new tower. The dean of Sumeriology, Samuel Noah Kramer, who translated The Curse of Agade (Akkad), wrote, “Its central theme concerns national catastrophe as a direct consequence of divine wrath kindled by a defiant act on the part of man.”    In The Curse of Akkad, cometary activity is described as the writers tell of the destruction of the Akkadian Empire by their heavenly gods who fought from heaven
The Curse of Akkad written in Sumerian provides an independent and much older account of the same basic set of events spoken about in the Bible’s story about the Destruction of the Tower of Babel.  In The Curse of Akkad the cometary goddess Inanna, the Queen of Heaven, who like a warrior hastening to his weapon, went forth against Akkad in battle and combat to attack it.    The Curse of Akkad and related works tell how there were “flashing potsherds raining from the sky,” “many stars falling from the sky,” so that “the raining dust rose sky high.”    The account of cometary impact as told in The Curse of Akkad was apparently written within a few centuries after the catastrophic event.
 Archeologists have found copies of The Curse of Akkad inscribed on clay tablets dating back to 1800 BC.  In the last 20 years tests have been performed on dust deposits excavated from suddenly abandoned Akkadian sites from around 2200 BC that have indicated the presence of trace elements associated with cometary activity.  The discovery in 2001 of the two-mile wide Amarah Crater in Southern Iraq has provided the physical evidence to confirm suspicions that cometary activity destroyed the Tower of Babel.
The Amarah impact, which produced energy equivalent to that of hundreds of Hiroshima sized atomic bombs, took place just 125 miles or so to the south of where ancient Akkad lay.  The historical corroboration with the Akkadian Empire, the direct physical evidence from the Amarah Crater, and the dust deposits now provide a powerful one-two punch in establishing the reality of one of the Bible’s first stories of catastrophe. 
It is the recognition that the Bible story of the Tower of Babel is about the destruction of an empire that links it to the destruction of the Akkadian Empire and thus the Amarah Crater.  Equally important, this Biblical account holds a warning to mankind, a warning about empire and the God of the Bible’s opposition to empire.  An empire is a type of government involving people of different lands under the rule of a single political authority, typically having an emperor as chief of state.  With such absolute authority comes great power.  Having people from different lands under one rule gives an empire the ability to marshal vast resources to accomplish its goals.  This would enable an emperor the power and capability to pursue anything he imagines or wishes.  Having one language does not enable a leader to do anything he imagines he can do (Genesis 11:6), but having absolute power over all people and lands gives him everything he needs.  A single nation no matter how powerful could not stand up to the multi-national forces of an ever growing empire.  (Where would the United States be if we did not enter World War II until after Adolph Hitler’s Third Reich [empire] had conquered all of Europe and Russia?)
The idea that the building of a city and temple tower was in and of itself threatening to the God of the Bible lacks credibility.  It should be noted that the remains of many temple towers have been found in Mesopotamia (approximately 28), and archeologists know that the Tower of Babel was not the first, nor the last, temple tower to be built in the region.  So, the defiant act that kindled divine wrath was not the building of the city and tower, but rather the establishment of the Near East’s first empire, since it is ruling an empire that would let a brutal dictator begin to do anything he imagined to do. 
A related reason the Bible gives for the God of the Bible’s opposition to empire, where one man could rule over all the nations of the earth, is that this position of authority is reserved for the God of the Bible.  The Bible says that God is to come in the person of the Messiah, the Christ, to “establish” an empire or kingdom that will last forever.  Isaiah 9:6-7 tells how “the government shall be upon His shoulder” and He will rule from “the throne of David.”  Daniel 2:44 NIV tells how during the end times “the God of heaven will set up a kingdom (empire) that will never be destroyed nor will it be left to another people…”  Daniel 7:13-14 tells how the Son of Man (the Messiah) will be given “dominion, and glory and a kingdom (empire), that all people, nations, and languages should serve him. . . .”[2]
Not only did the emperors of the Akkadian Empire expand the empire and seek to rule over many nations, they also aspired to be worshipped as living gods.  Even though Sargon was an Akkadian, he made the Sumerian religion the “official” religion of the Akkadian Empire.  By virtue of his holy marriage (hieros- gamos) to the patron goddess of the new empire, the goddess Inanna bestowed all power to rule on earth to him, and Sargon declared himself to be a god-king.  Thus, through marriage to the “woman,” a goddess, the emperors of the Akkadian empire were worshipped as living gods (“ruler-worship).
Are you seeing the forewarning of the Antichrist to come?  Just as the story of the Tower of Babel involved a dictator who led a powerful empire that would defy God, Bible prophecy says that during the end times the antichrist will arise and form a worldwide empire and defy God by seeking to rule over the whole world and be worshipped as God.  Thus, the message of an all powerful ruler who claims himself to be a god in the story of the Tower of Babel relates to the empire the Bible says will be established by the antichrist during the end times. 
The Bible says that the antichrist, a dictator who “will succeed in whatever he does” (Daniel 8:23-24 NIV), will eventually seek to be worshipped as God and exalt himself above God.[3]  II Thessalonians 2:3-4 says this antichrist will even sit in the rebuilt Temple of God in Jerusalem “proclaiming himself to be God.”   Just as The Curse of Akkad and the Bible’s story of the Tower tell how a defiant act on the part of mankind kindled divine wrath, resulting in cosmic catastrophe destroying the empire, the Bible says that cosmic catastrophe will destroy the empire of the antichrist.  The Seven Trumpets and the Seven Vials of the Book of Revelation detail the basic sequence of cosmic impacts that will accomplish this destruction. 
There is another reason the Bible gives for the God of the Bible being opposed to empire.  An empire with its state religion takes away each person’s freedom to choose the god he will serve.  The God of the Bible has given each person free will and the freedom to choose who or what they will serve or believe.  In the empire begun by Sargon, the state religion was primarily the worship of a “woman,” a goddess, and in the empire of the antichrist, the state religion will also involve the worship of a “woman,” a goddess.  Ultimately, the empire of the antichrist will involve worship of the antichrist who will attempt to rule as a living god, just as Sargon did.
The Book of Revelation tells how the final empire will also involve the worship of a woman until the empire disavows her (Revelation 17:16).  Actually this woman, who in Revelation 17:1-7 is called the “The Great Whore,” and described as “Mystery, Babylon The Great, The Mother of Harlots (Idolatresses) and Abominations of the Earth” is none other than Inanna, the “Queen of Heaven” (Jeremiah 7:18, 44:17-19, and 25).  It is this same Inanna, the “wicked” and “winged” woman for whom a house or tower were built in the land of Shinar at Babylon (Zechariah 5:7-11, Genesis 10:10, and 11:4-9)!  The essence of this idolatrous religious system would be carried forward in time from Nimrod/Sargon’s empire to the end times empire of the antichrist.  The Bible says that God would bring about the destruction of this “woman,” and all who have all invaded Israel, that is, the Neo-Babylonian, Persian, Greek, and Roman Empires (Daniel 2:24-45, and 7:3-27).  The Bible also says that God will bring the destruction of the antichrist’s empire which will represent the third and final expression of Roman Empire (the ancient Roman Empire, the Holy Roman Empire of the Crusades, and the “revived” Holy Roman Empire in the form of the European Community) after it invades Israel during the end times (Daniel 2:24-45, 7:3-27, 11:36-45, and Revelation 13:1-3).  As this study of the tale of the Tower shows that the God of the Bible used comets to bring the collapse of the pretentious Akkadian Empire, its destruction is consistent with the pattern of God using comets as the weapons of His wrath.  If we acknowledge that there is indeed a pattern of cometary activity chronicled in the Bible, it seems that the same type of religious and political machinations that brought on God’s wrath and resulted in the destruction of the historical Akkadian Empire by comets will again bring on God’s wrath and result in the destruction of the antichrist’s Empire by comets.
 
 


[1]           The inscription on the famous hunting relief of Ashurbanipal (669-633 BC) housed in the British Museum says: “I am Ashurbanipal, King of the Universe, King of Assyria . . . endowed with surpassing might.  The lions which I slew: I seized a fierce lion of the plain by his ears . . . I pierced his body with my lance . . . in my lordly sport I seized a lion of the plain by his tail . . . I smashed his skull with the club of my hand . . . in my lordly sport they let a fierce lion of the plain out of his cage and on foot with my spear . . . I stabbed him later with my iron girdle dagger and he died . . . I shattering the might of the lions . . . .” from Daniel D. Luckenbill, Ph.D. Ancient Records of Assyria and Babylonia, Vol. II – Historical Records of Assyria, University of Chicago Press, 1926, pp. 391-392.
 
[2]           In Daniel 7:14 delineating that the “kingdom” (#4437 malkuw, dominion, empire, kingdom, realm) of the Messiah will include all people, nations and languages,” we have the equivalent of the modern working definition of “empire,” as a political entity of two or more nations.
 
[3]           This is not unlike the Bible telling how Lucifer, or the devil wanted to raise his throne above God’s throne in heaven, and sit in heaven and ”be like the most high” – Isaiah 14:12-15.
 
 
 
                                                   

The Tale of the Tower – Part 1

 
Lucas van Valckenborch    1568
 
 
IMPORTANT SUMERIAN AND AKKADIAN SITES AND THE BIBLE
Genesis 10:10 refers to "Babel" (Babylon-NIV), "Erech," "Akkad," and "the land of Shinar." // Genesis 11:28-31 refer to "Ur." // Genesis 11:31, 32 and 12:4-5 refer to "Haran."This map also shows the location of the Amarah Crater. This two mile in diameter crater provides physical evidence that a cosmic impact took place in the Holy Land during Biblical times. The crater was discovered after Saddam Hussein had the lakes drained in Southern Iraq in retaliation against the Marsh Arabs in the area. The Sumerian text The Curse of Akkad and the Bible’s story of the destruction of the "Tower of Babel" both record the occurrence of this catastrophic event which ties to the sudden abandonment of Akkadian sites, and collapse of the Akkadian Empire.


The Tale of the Tower – Part 1

The Truth about What Really Happened at the Tower of Babel

In his book excerpt from The Comets of God, archeologist and author, Dr. Jeffrey Goodman forces readers to look at the Tower of Babel Bible story with new analytical eyes and a heavy dose of skepticism.   

 

Its central theme [“The Curse of Agade”] concerns national catastrophe as a direct consequence of divine wrath kindled by a defiant act on the part of man.

 

                                                Samuel Noah Kramer, who

                                                Translated the Sumerian work

                                                The Curse of Agade” (Akkad)

 

 

Why should we care about the story of the Tower of Babel?  This strange little nine verse story packs a powerful punch!  First, it illustrates beautifully that when translators have no clue what happened, it is possible to come up with a fairy tale that is far from reality.  Yet this brief story contains enough information that undeniably validates its place in the historical record.

As traditionally told in the Bible, the story of “The Destruction of the Tower of Babel” (Genesis 10:8-10 and 11:1-9) is about a time when the whole world spoke the same language, and people came together to make a “name” or “authority” for themselves by building a new city and a new temple tower at Babel in the “land of Shinar.”  However, because the people became one and had one language, nothing they imagined they could do would be restrained from them.  The God of the Bible then went down and confused or mixed their language so that they could not understand one another’s speech.  People’s speech now sounded like babble to one another.  This traditional translation and interpretation says that, as a result of the destruction of this universal language, an event popularly called “the confusion of tongues,” people stopped building the new city and the new temple tower, and the Lord scattered the people over the face of the whole world. 

There are several problems with this version of the story.  First, this traditional translation and interpretation of the Tower story derived hundreds of years ago does not fit with what we know from other scriptures in the Bible (Genesis 10:10 and Zechariah 5:11) that also talk about the “land of Shinar.”  The second problem is that the traditional interpretation of a universal language at the time of the Tower does not fit archeological and historical records. Most importantly, we get a very different account about what happened from the writings of the people from the land of Shinar, who were building the new tower.

The historical record clearly shows that the people referred to in the Tower story were Sumerian and Akkadian, people who joined together from two different nations to form the Akkadian Empire. Fortunately for us, these people left written records behind.  These cuneiform records are helpful in determining an accurate translation of the Tower story.  In addition, physical evidence has been found that confirms their account of what caused them to stop building the new city and tower and abandon the area.  Taken together these events resulted in the sudden collapse of their new empire, and gives us a different explanation of the story recorded in the Bible.

For many in the archeological, historic and linguistic world this Bible story has kept them from taking the Bible too seriously.  The story does not fit with what archeologists know about the ancient cultures of the Near East and about the origins of the languages of the world.  There could have been no universal language at the time of the story because different populations of people speaking different languages in Europe, Asia, Africa, the Pacific, and the Americas had existed long before the first temple towers (ziggurat from zigura “to raise up”) were built in Mesopotamia. (It was the Sumerians who first built these temple towers to worship their gods.)

Specifically, it is now well known that two totally different languages, Sumerian and Akkadian (Babylonian and Assyrian are later dialects of Akkadian) were spoken in the “land of Shinar” (Genesis 10:10, 11:2 and Zechariah 5:11) long before the Tower of Babel (Babylon) was built there. Archeological sites have yielded tens of thousands of cuneiform tablets written in both Sumerian and Akkadian, some dating to over 1,000 years before the new tower and the new city referred to in the Bible story were built.  Further, the phrase “land of Shinar” is actually a direct reference to these two cultures when two very different languages were spoken.  The word “Shinar” is merely the spelling out in English (transliteration), of a Sumerian word that means “Sumer-Akkad” just as ancient literature repeatedly makes reference to “the land of Sumer and Akkad.” [1]  In fact, in the land of Shinar, that is, in the land of Sumer and Akkad (Akkad was to the north of Sumer), different languages were not a point of confusion, since the Akkadians, the Semitic conquerors of the Sumerians, for the most part adopted the Sumerian culture and made Sumerian their literary and religious language.  The schools for scribes at the new city of Akkad (Genesis 10:10 and 11:4) made the study of Sumerian their basic discipline, and there were bilingual dictionaries and even manuscripts where each line in a Sumerian composition was followed by the Akkadian translation. 

How could the Bible be so wrong about the origins of the different languages of the world?  The answer is the Bible isn’t wrong; the problems lie with the translation and interpretation of certain lines from the original text.  Reevaluating the translation and interpretation of the original Hebrew text should be the first step when the scriptures appear to be incorrect when compared to the known historical or scientific record.  Mistakes made in earlier translations and interpretations must not be upheld and defended as Biblical truth simply because the erroneous interpretation has been accepted as fact for centuries by respected theologians.           

            These errors in translation and interpretation in the story of the Tower of Babel become apparent once the literal meaning of the original Hebrew words used in this Biblical story are researched.  Careful examination reveals this is not a story about the destruction of a universal “language” to stop the building of a city and a temple tower, but rather a story about the destruction of the Middle East’s first empire, the empire of Sumer and Akkad, which was called the “Akkadian Empire,” to keep this empire from becoming too powerful.  As stated, the corrected translation of these events is supported by cuneiform writings, the historical record, and by physical evidence.  (The destruction of this first empire has a direct correlation to end times Bible prophecy which tells of a coming antichrist and his empire.) 

So, how did the mistranslation and misinterpretation of the Tower story come about?  Since the ancient Hebrew language did not use vowels, the traditional translation of the Tower story has taken the Hebrew consonants b-b-l to denote the word “babel” and then assumed this word meant “confusion caused by language differences.”  This is nothing but a play on words that is solely based on the word “babel” being similar to the actual Hebrew word (balal) for “confusion” or “mixing.”[2]  But, despite the popularity of this contrived etymology, “babel” is not a Hebrew word, nor should it even appear in the story of the Tower in the first place. 

The Hebrew consonants b-b-l actually constitutes the spelling out in Hebrew, the transliteration of the Akkadian word babylon” or “babilum.”    The Hebrew consonants b-b-l appears in the Old Testament 282 times and only twice are they rendered as “Babel,” with both instances appearing in the Tower story.  The other 280 times these consonants are rendered as “Babylon.”  More recent translations than the King James Version of the Bible, such as the New American Standard (NAS) and the New International Version (NIV), acknowledge that the consonants translated as “Babel” should be translated as “Babylon.” 

Archeologists have long known the name “Babylon” is an Akkadian word that means “gate of god,” or “house of god,” and that every  temple tower was called a babylon, a gate or house of god.[3] Thus, the Hebrew consonants b-b-l in this story actually refers to a place that came to be called “Babylon” because of the babylon, the temple tower that was built there.  The Moody Bible Institute in The Wycliffe Bible Commentary says that, “The best Hebrew lexicographers claim that it [Babel translated Babylon] could not have come from the Hebrew balal to ‘confuse’ or ‘mix,’ but that it meant ‘gate of God.’” The Baker Encyclopedia of the Bible says “a popular etymology [for Babel or Babylon] replaced the original meaning of the name.”   

The key to determining that this story is actually about the destruction of an empire comes from learning the meaning of certain types of political idioms or expressions peculiar to the ancient Near East.  For example, in Genesis 11:1 the original Hebrew text of this story literally says “the whole land was of one lip” (e.g. see Septuagint).  This has been traditionally translated as “the whole earth was of one language.”  However, in the ancient Near East “one lip” is an idiom that means “one government.”  Confirmation of this interpretation comes from other terms that are used a number of times in the original Hebrew text of the story that refer to “one government,” “one command” and the people being “one” or “united.”  The concepts of “one government,” “one command,” and being “united” convey the concept of “empire.”

Thus, while the traditional translation of Genesis 11:1 says, “And the whole earth was of one language and of one speech”; a historically correct translation of Genesis 11:1 says, “And the whole land was of one government and one commander.”  Obviously, the concept of “one government” and “one commander” fit the description of an “empire.”  It was through the political power of an empire that the people become “one” and made a “name” or “authority” for themselves (Genesis 11:6 and 11:4 NIV), not the building of another temple tower. To strengthen this empire the Akkadians, the Semitic conquerors of the Sumerians, adopted the Sumerian religion, and a new city and tower or babylon was being built to serve the new empire.

                      Genesis 11: 1 Translation

Literal                        Traditional                    Historically correct

“And the whole land         “And the whole earth     “And the whole land was

or earth was of one            was of one language        of one government and

lip and of one word,           and of one speech.”          one commander.

cause or command.”

 

Coincidentally, a Babylonian document used the same type of idiom that was used in the Bible’s story of the Tower of Babel.  This document tells how Sargon, the founder of the Akkadian Empire, conquered a number of countries.  Then it literally says, “He made its (the land’s) mouth be one,” which has been translated by a leading expert in the language as “He established there a central government.  In this case, the idiom “mouth be one” was used to refer to “central government,” which is another way to convey the concept of “empire.”[4] 

            Even if one doesn’t know that “one lip” is an ancient idiom meaning “one government,” there is another way to determine that this is a story about the destruction of an empire and not a universal language.  The Hebrew word that literally means “lip” (saw-faw #8193 in Strong’s Concordance) that is traditionally translated as “language” or “speech” in the Tower story (Genesis 11:1, 6, 7 and 9) can also be taken to be a Hebrew word that means “gathering” (saw-fakh #5596 in Strong’s Concordance), where “one gathering” is consistent with “one government” under one commander as in empire.[5]  The three Hebrew consonants used for the Hebrew word meaning “lip” (#8193 in Strong’s Concordance) are the same consonants used for the Hebrew word meaning “gathering” (#5596 Strong’s Concordance), the only difference being in the vowel signs. 

(It is important to understand that the writing of ancient Hebrew only used consonants.  Consonants were written down, vowels were not written down.  It was not until about 600 AD that a complete system of vowel signs was added to the text of the Old Testament by the scribes of the Massoretes [“transmitters”].  So aside from context, it is impossible to distinguish between certain ancient Hebrew words that contain the same set of consonants as in the case with words #8193 and #5596 in Strong’s Concordance. )

Thus, in Genesis 11:1 we can have “one gathering” or “one government” (“one lip”) under “one commander,” where either translation fits the historical context of the Akkadian Empire as begun and commanded by Sargon.  This empire brought people of different states, cultures and languages together into a single politico-religious entity in the land of Shinar.  Genesis 10:10 tells how the land of Shinar, that is, the land of Sumer and Akkad, included the Sumerian city of Erech (Uruk) and the Akkadian cities of Akkad and Babylon.  The lesson here is that Biblical translations cannot ignore historical or cultural context.  When the Tower story is correctly translated and interpreted, the Bible should be credited with accurately telling the story of the collapse of the historical Akkadian Empire.

So why did God destroy the tower and how?  Why is this Bible story important and how does it connect to the end times?  This story contains a sore spot for God and a warning for mankind that practically guarantees the intervention of God every time.  The answers are revealed in Part 2 of The Tale of the Tower.

 




[1][1] The unquestioned dean of Sumeriology, Samuel Noah Kramer wrote that scholars usually identify the word “Shinar” with Sumer, but it “actually stands for the Sumerian equivalent of the compound word ‘Sumer-Akkad.’” Samuel Noah Kramer, The Sumerians: Their History, Culture and Character,the University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1963, p. 297.

[2][2] In Modern Hebrew the actual word for the phenomena of speech known as “babble”is “siyach” not “babel.”

[3][3] To the Sumerians and the Akkadians a “gate of god” also represented a“door of god,” a “gate of heaven,” and a “house of god”; places where man and god met. Proverbs 8:34 talks about watching daily at God’s “gates” and at his “doors.” In Genesis 28:12-17 Jacob after dreaming of a ladder or stairs reaching to heaven and seeing God says, “How awesome is the place, this is none other but the house of God, and this is the gate of heaven.”

[4][4] Interestingly, the NIV in two instances translates the Hebrew word translated as “lip” (#8193 in Strong’s Concordance) as “mouth.”

[5][5] For example, the Hebrew word saw-fakh (#5596 in Strong’s Concordance) is translated as “gathered together” in Job 30:7 KJV and NAS and“unite” in Isaiah 14:1 NIV.